William Eichler 04 August 2016

Report criticising PSPOs ‘trivialises’ anti-social behaviour, LGA says

Council leaders defend the use of anti-social behaviour legislation against accusations they are creating ‘bizarre new criminal offences’.

The anti-regulation campaign group Manifesto Club has criticised the employment of Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) by local authorities and called for them to be ‘scrapped or dramatically scaled back’.

They said the rate of PSPOs has increased and they argued this is ‘leading to increasingly bizarre new criminal offences.’

The 2014 Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act introduced PSPOs to help councils tackle anti-social behaviour, defined as anything which local authorities feel may have a ‘detrimental effect’ on the ‘quality of life’ of residents.

The Manifesto Club has published an updated version of its Busybodies’ Charter which claimed by February 2016 130 PSPOs had been issued by 79 local authorities – including 9 bans on swearing, three bans on rough sleeping, and 12 bans on loitering or standing in groups.

The group argues the use of PSPOs lead to the ‘criminalisation of everyday activities in public spaces and the undermining of fundamental public freedoms.’

The Local Government Association (LGA) has responded accusing the Manifesto Club of ‘trivialising’ anti-social behaviour which, it says, can have ‘tragic consequences’.

‘This report completely trivialises anti-social behaviour, such as aggressive begging, public drinking or racing in cars,’ Cllr Simon Blackburn, chair of the LGA's safer and stronger communities board, said.

‘These are serious offences that make the lives of victims a misery – in some cases with tragic consequences. Councils are determined to protect their communities from behaviour that ruins their quality of life or means people are scared to visit public places.’

PSPOs, Cllr Blackburn added, are ‘effective tools’ which are ‘subject to democratic scrutiny and review.’

‘Councils listen to the concerns of local residents and businesses and consult with them to bring in PSPOs to address particular anti-social behaviour issues,’ Cllr Blackburn continued.

‘Crime and anti-social behaviour by its very nature varies from place to place and that is why different councils are responding in a variety of ways.’

Black hole spending review image

Black hole spending review

Jonathan Werran, chief executive of Localis, reflects on what the Spending Review means for local government.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner