William Eichler 22 January 2016

Poorest pensioners paying ‘secret subsidy’ for care

The families of the poorest pensioners could be subsidising the cost of essential care because councils are ignoring rules intended to protect them from unfair care home fees, according to Independent Age.

A Freedom of Information (FoI) request sent to every council in England by the older people’s charity found that for the period April to June 2015, 43% (53 out of 122 councils who responded) did not comply with at least one of the requirements of the 2015 Care Act which ensures pensioners’ families are not charged ‘top-up’ fees for care that should be free.

Top-up fees are an option for care home residents whose costs are partly or fully paid by their local council. They are voluntary payments that allow people to purchase ‘extras’, such as a nicer view, for their relatives.

Last year’s Care Act was introduced to tighten the rules around these fees to prevent councils from charging ‘top-up’ fees for care that should be free. At its core, the Act stated that the extra fees should always involve the informed consent of all parties, should be a written agreement, and arrangements should be reviewed regularly.

Independent Age’s findings show that nearly half of respondents were flouting some or all of these requirements in order to compensate for cuts to their care budgets.

The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services estimate that councils have faced reductions of £4.6bn to adult social care budgets since 2009-10 – almost a third of net real terms spend.

Janet Morrison, Chief Executive of Independent Age, said: ‘We understand that councils are under huge financial pressure. But in a drive to find savings to social care budgets, they must not pass the burden of this ‘secret subsidy’ on to the families of poorer pensioners.

‘It is only poorer pensioners who qualify for a local authority funded care home place, and yet it is their families that are being asked to make up the shortfall in care budgets. We hear all the time from families who are willing to do anything they can to ensure their elderly relatives get decent care, even if they’re struggling financially themselves. That’s why it’s so important that there are rules to make sure they do not feel pressured into paying fees unnecessarily.’

‘Top-up fees must always be optional, affordable and transparent’, she continued. ‘The rules introduced by the government should ensure that is the case. So it is very worrying that so many councils are still failing to follow these basic principles.’

Responding to Independent Age's survey on care home top-up fees, Harold Bodmer, Vice President of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, said: ‘Councils work closely with providers to ensure a diverse and quality provider market that gives people the right choice of care options. However, despite councils' best efforts it is inevitable that the unprecedented financial pressure on local authorities has an impact on this.

‘Top-ups of local authority care home fees have always been a part of the social care system. It is, of course, important that people who fund their own care and people who pay top-ups are given the right advice and support.

‘However, this is about an increasingly fragile provider market and only when there is a properly and adequately resourced adult social care system can we address the growing concerns to support vulnerable people in our communities.’

The new Centre for Young Lives image

The new Centre for Young Lives

Anne Longfield CBE, the chair of the Commission on Young Lives, discusses the launch of the Centre for Young Lives this month.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Casual Play Worker RBKC615334

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£16.90 per hour
Bring joy into countless lives – and explore the most fulfilling career. Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Project Manager (Mechanical and Electrical) RBKC614771

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£55,497 - £63,045 per annum
Help deliver safe and carbon-neutral homes and a green heat network by 2030. Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Project Manager (Major Works) RBKC616345

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£55,497 - £63,045 per annum
Collaborate with residents and colleagues on a wide portfolio of vital contracts and projects. Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Programme Control Officer - Team Barrow -WMF1045e

Westmorland and Furness Council
£35,745 to £36,648
We are looking for forward-thinking individuals to join ‘Team Barrow’ who are passionate about delivering positive change. Barrow in Furness, Cumbria
Recuriter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Locality Officer Level 2 - Part Time - WMF1048e

Westmorland and Furness Council
£26,421 - £27,334
Westmorland and Furness Council is seeking to recruit a Level 2 Locality Officer Ulverston, Cumbria
Recuriter: Westmorland and Furness Council
Linkedin Banner

Partner Content

Circular highways is a necessity not an aspiration – and it’s within our grasp

Shell is helping power the journey towards a circular paving industry with Shell Bitumen LT R, a new product for roads that uses plastics destined for landfill as part of the additives to make the bitumen.

Support from Effective Energy Group for Local Authorities to Deliver £430m Sustainable Warmth Funded Energy Efficiency Projects

Effective Energy Group is now offering its support to the 40 Local Authorities who have received a share of the £430m to deliver their projects on the ground by surveying properties and installing measures.

Pay.UK – the next step in Bacs’ evolution

Dougie Belmore explains how one of the main interfaces between you and Bacs is about to change.