Thomas Bridge 12 June 2015

Housing chief blasts Right to Buy expansion as ‘dangerously bad’

The chief of UK housing associations has warned Right to Buy expansion is a ‘dangerously bad’ policy that would hamper national ambition.

David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, has said Government plans to extend discounts on buying a home to 1.3m tenants in housing association properties would ‘deny the aspirations of many, many more people than it will support’.

Councils would be forced to sell off thousands of their most valuable social residences to fund the policy, with three London boroughs recently claiming they would face losing 3,500 council homes in five years under the proposals. Orr has now said this approach could hamper long term house building, failing to leave enough money for future construction.

Communities secretary Greg Clark has maintained the policy would ‘add to housing stock’, with every housing association property sold being ‘replaced one-for-one with a new property’.

Prime minister David Cameron has also backed the plans, claiming it will see ‘a new generation given the security of a home of their own’.

However Orr has said the measure ‘completely fails to make the most efficient possible use of public investment’, which isn’t ‘workable or coherent’.

‘At its heart, imposing the Right to Buy on housing associations is a policy that will deny the aspirations of many, many more people than it will support,’ he said.

‘If the Government can force councils to sell their high value stock and from the proceeds give £100,000 or more to one household to support that household's aspiration to own, it denies the chance to use that £100,000 to build new homes. That money, with the additional private borrowing that housing associations generate, could deliver four brand new homes for shared ownership with all of the associated economic benefits that come from building new homes.

‘To meet the aspiration of one already well housed family denies the aspirations of four others. There are many other measures we could develop with government that support ownership aspirations and the aspirations of those who need a good, secure affordable home in a much more cost effective way.’

‘If ever there was a time for Parliament to intervene and stop dangerously bad legislation it is now,’ Orr added.

Photo: Tom Gowanlock/Shutterstock.com

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Transformation project manager (children, education & families)

Oxfordshire County Council
£46142 - £49282
About you Are you skilled at bringing people together? Are you passionate about improving outcomes for children and young people? We’re looking for an experienced Project Manager to drive delivery of our new Education & Inclusion Strategy in partnershi County Hall as primary office base, with hybrid wo
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Pensions Officer – Payroll, Payments and Projects

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£37,602- £45,564 per year (starting salary depen
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Child Practitioner - Kinship Matters Support Worker

Oxfordshire County Council
£38220 - £40777
About UsTheKinshipMatte... Oxfordshire
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Advanced Skills Worker

Essex County Council
£31931.00 - £36423.00 per annum
Advanced Skills WorkerPermanent, Full Time£31,931 to £36,423 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker - Assessment & Intervention, West Essex

Essex County Council
£37185 - £50081 per annum
This is a fixed term contract or secondment opportunity for 6 months.Here in Essex, we continue to raise the bar about practice and our investment in England, Essex, Harlow
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner